Human Rights Under Democracy - 4077 Words

HUMAN RIGHTS UNDER DEMOCRACY K. Ramana Prasad Introduction Ever since the organisastion of societies in different forms came about, conflicts in the manner of assuming, conferring or exercising of authority and rights and contingent duties for the accepted ideals have been considered in great detail by eminent thinkers. Accordingly, concepts like democracy, liberty, equality, fraternity, state, nation, privileges and forms of governments ranging from absolute monarchy to militarism to democratic functioning in different mores have been analyzed, given shape and systematically followed by different peoples in different climes and†¦show more content†¦Modern States Organisation of modern states was not a smooth task. Even in the past and medieval times, monarchy or any other type of government involved use of force to create, sustain and often enlarge the domain of the state. Philosophers from the time of Socrates down to Bertrand Russell in modern times have dwelt at length on the consent of the governed, participation of the governed, opportunities of the governed, enlargement of the scope of the governed in the process of government for the betterment of individuals and institutions, societies and the world at large. Many modern states have attempted to incorporate in their political constitutions the noble ideals of different nations so that the benefit of collective wisdom is shared and applied in detail to avoid pitfalls encountered by others. In brief, we have to assume that a modern state has to be concerned with appropriate rights and duties of the citizens who constitute the state. After all, governments are but reflections of the people composing the state. As the heritage of humanity is common, as indeed scientific and literary delights have been shared, so too the political values need to be imbibed by people to look forward to a betterment of their lives. For we have not reached the stage of people as a community without the burden of the instrument of aShow MoreRelatedThe Rise Of Islamic Extremist Groups769 Words   |  4 Pagesrise of islamic extremist groups in some of the 55 muslim-majority nations in the world are that U.S. administrations mostly support dictators in the Muslim world, as long as they are allies and follow american orders , ignoring their records on human rights, accountability, and democracy.many of the countries are dysfunctional corrupt repressive state neither willing nor capable of refo rm yet americans will support them if they are a use to American needs there are many positive signs that theRead MoreDemocracy And American Politics : Wealth Vs. Want1246 Words   |  5 PagesAssignment # 1 Democracy and American Politics. Wealth vs. Want For better or worse man has no choice but to live in society, but yet to live in society individuals are involved in multiple situations that lead to conflicts and disputes. Democracy is the only viable political framework and satisfactory for a society to move in harmony. Democracy allows us to find additional solutions that reflect the multitude of interests that exist in society. The authors of the books The Struggle for Democracy mentionâ€Å"Read MoreA Thesis Statement : Monarchy And Democracy1476 Words   |  6 Pages Thesis Statement: Monarchy and Democracy Through assessing both monarchy and democracy from both perspectives of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, one can see that democracy creates the most beneficial outcome. Today, many people associate the ideals Locke adopts with democracy. Although, in Locke’s book, Second Treatise of Government, he did not solely focus on democracy. He listed many types of government, not favoring any. He believed that as long as they adhere to his rules, they remain validRead MoreDifferences Between Monarchy and Democracy784 Words   |  4 PagesDifferences between Monarchy and Democracy 1. Democracy is a type of government that emanates from the constituted powers that are elected, depending on the system (presidentialist, parliamentary, constitutional monarchy, semi presidentialist, semi parliamentary, etc...) directly or indirectly by the people. Whereas in an absolute monarchy, an absolutist regime exists and is in power because of family lineage. 2. In democracy three state powers(in most cases) exist as a checks and balancesRead MoreMonarchy Vs. Democracy By Thomas Hobbes And John Locke1655 Words   |  7 Pages Monarchy vs Democracy Through assessing both monarchy and democracy from both perspectives of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, one can see that democracy creates the most beneficial outcome. Hobbes had a pessimistic view of people. He believed humans were selfish, doing anything to further their own position in life. Hobbes believed in an absolute monarchy, a government that gave all the power to a king or queen. Even though he distrusted democracy, he believed that a diverse group of representativesRead MoreFeatures Of The Written Constitution Essay1556 Words   |  7 Pagesconstitution. Then I state clear summary of three features of current New Zealand constitution comprised of democracy principle, its timely adaptability, and its various sources. After that, there are three features of written constitution which are democracy principles, an entrenched law and an enforceable mechanism would be illustrated. Finally, I would point out how and why a Bill of Right and an entrenched supreme law are worth incl uding features, whereas the Treaty of Waitangi should be excludedRead MoreA comparison Study of Russia and Estonia1171 Words   |  5 PagesHuman rights are a fundamental aspect of the lives of individuals. The atrocities committed throughout history have prompt the formation of a variety of organizations that have encourage the advancement and respect for the human rights of all individuals around the world. Despite a growing human rights movement and awareness among individuals, many countries still continue to violate the human rights of their citizens. There could be many reasons for this trend, but there are certain factors thatRead MoreIs Democracy Promotion A Mask For Hegemonic Power?1546 Words   |  7 PagesIs democracy-promotion a mask for hegemonic power? Should liberal democracies impose their principles, values and ideals upon less democratic states? Hegemony is the concept meaning primacy of the leading state over the subordinate states without the use of any direct forms of violence (invasion, occupation or annexation). Many scholars in international relations have tried to find an answer to these questions, but they are still open to a much debate and discussion. Liberals believe that democracyRead MoreIn This Part Of The Essay, Tunisia And Libya Are Discussed1716 Words   |  7 Pagesin accordance with democratic values during the reign of King Idris. Tunisia under the rule of Ben Ali had very limited political freedom particularly for the members of the media. In an observation released by the Freedom House website, a US- based non-governmental organization that advocates human rights and freedom rated Tunisia as ‘not free’ and scored bad marks on freedom rating, civil liberties and political rights. The analysis was made on numerous elements that representing the media andRead MoreThe International Human Rights Regime Has Its Weaknesses And Flaws1093 Words   |  5 PagesRam Chadha HR Final Exam The question that states that the international human rights regime does not have a hard enforcement mechanism and until there are serious consequences to violations, states won’t comply with human rights is a topic I happen to disagree with. I realize the international human rights regime has its weaknesses and flaws. However, these weaknesses are due to inescapable aspects of our disordered global society, especially the principle of state sovereignty. At the end

Legal Political and Ethical Dimensions of Business

Questions: 1. There has been a movement in the last decade encouraging people to buy American. Discuss the legal and ethical issues related to boycotting goods from other countries. What are the practical business implications of such a move? 2. The World Trade Organization, or WTO, is the largest and most influential of the trade organizations. China and other heavy counterfeiting nations are part of this group. What could WTO-participating nations do to address the problems of counterfeiting? What should they do? 3. The United Nations Security Council, the main decision-making body at the UN, is comprised of five regular members: China, France, the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom and the United States. Ten more members are elected from the General Assembly. Given the make-up of the committee, what type of action might the UN take with regard to the counterfeiting issue? Answers: 1. The section 2407 OF THE United States Code talks about foreign boycotts. This section indicates a message from the President of the United States of America that every American national should boycott goods made in foreign countries. The primary objective behind boycotting foreign goods is to promote local manufacturers and increase the economy of the country. Thus, some may perceive boycotting goods made by foreign countries which are better in quality and lower in price compared to the local goods as unethical and foolish rather than patriotic, while others may consider it to be reasonable. Therefore, the boycott of foreign goods is generally a matter of choice. Refusing or prohibiting another to refrain from using foreign goods or keep any association with foreign company is additionally a violation in freedom to trade and freedom of choice as a consumer. Thus, the business implications of boycotting foreign goods can encourage domestic trade and businesses but at the same time violate citizens right to choice as a consumer and also right to trade (Ambrose and Stephen 2010). 2. Counterfeiting is a termed used for intentional reproducing a copy of a genuine article or goods in order to mislead a buyer into believing that they are actually buying or purchasing a genuine product. The World Trade Organization initiated an Anticounterfeiting Enforcement Committee (ACEC) which suggested the following steps to combat Counterfeiting from member states like China:- Introduce collection of fines against countries which engage in Counterfeiting The said step not only suggested collection of fines from countries engaged in Counterfeiting but also suggested to device methods for calculation of fines and penalties for Counterfeiting. Enforcement of strict customs against trafficking of Counterfeited goods across borders The Anticounterfeiting Enforcement Committee (ACEC) suggested that laws in relation to trading of goods across border needs to be strict for managing and filtering trade of counterfeited goods (Jackson 2010). Introduction of statutory damages In most cases, the civil penalties and compensation are not sufficient to cover the actual losses a company suffers due to Counterfeiting of their produced goods, thus, Anticounterfeiting Enforcement Committee (ACEC) suggested the governments of member states of World Trade Centre to amend their trademark laws to include a pre-determined damage amount for counterfeited goods (Hawkins and Richard 2010). 3. United Nations is a global organisation which promotes international cooperation between countries. The primary objective of the most important organ of the United Nation is to make decisions which are in relation to global problems and crisis. These decisions are made by Security Council. The Security Council of the United Nation has recently adopted a campaignto create awareness about the evil effects of Counterfeiting. The United Nation aims to make countries realize that Counterfeiting is a crime which adversely affects government, customers and businesses. The United Nations shall impose a ban on goods which are counterfeited and imposes heavy penalties on countries that encourage Counterfeiting (Halperin et al 2010). Reference List Ambrose, Stephen E.Rise to globalism: American foreign policy since 1938. Penguin, 2010. Halperin, Arnold, Paul Andrew Moskowitz, Alejandro Gabriel Schrott, Charles P. Tresser, and Robert Jacob Von Gutfeld. "Method and system for preventing counterfeiting of high price wholesale and retail items." U.S. Patent 6,226,619, issued May 1, 2001. Hawkins, Richard A. "Boycotts, buycotts and consumer activism in a global context: An overview."Management Organizational History5, no. 2 (2010): 123-143. Jackson, Graham, Stefan Arver, Ian Banks, and Vera J. Stecher. "Counterfeit phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors pose significant safety risks."International journal of clinical practice64, no. 4 (2010): 497-504.